Ed Boyden, biological engineering professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, has made a name for himself in the neuroscience community by thinking outside the box and challenging our understanding of the possible and the impossible. As a relatively young principal investigator, he has already inspired and enabled scientists to ask questions that were previously unaskable.
Neuroscience has become a popular field in the last decade, partially because before then there were too many unaskable questions. The brain is encased in thick bone and if you take it out to look at how it works, whatever animal it belongs to will die. These factors, among others, made neuroscience research less accessible than other fields of biological investigation. One reason the field has erupted in recent years is improved technology. We now have the tools to ask questions that we couldn’t ask before, such as “From where does this specific cell get chemical information?” (See my last post for more information on some of these tools.) Yet with every answered question and every new tool, we find several more questions and the need for new tools to answer them.
With the ability to understand what makes up our brains, we now need newer fancier microscopes that allow us to see even smaller. Ed Boyden asked a simple question: Do we need to build new microscopes to see smaller structures within the brain, or can we make those structures bigger and continue to use the same microscopes as before? Others may have asked this question before, but Ed Boyden and his team actually made it happen. How?
Figure 1. A child with a diaper on their head might not sound scientific because no, it’s not scientific. But the idea of using diaper technology on a brain; that’s real science! Source: Flickr, waitingforwonderful
What expands on its own? A diaper. An easy question with an easy solution… Or maybe it’s more complicated than that. How do you get a diaper into someone’s brain? The Boyden lab took the expanding ingredient from diapers, sodium polyacrylate, and added it to brain tissue to make the target area bigger . Sodium polyacrylate absorbs water and swells in the process. The lab has found a way to harness the sodium polyacrylate and take tissue with it as it swells. By de-crowding the brain tissue, they have managed to get ten times higher yield of the different molecules inside. Now, they can see more of what’s in that previously dense cluster under a microscope. The lab found that when they allowed tissue to expand using this technique, they introduced about 14 nanometers of error in molecule movement. By comparing an image of the tissue before expansion with an image after expansion, they quantified this error in the location of different components. And when you’re talking about molecules within a cell, nanometers matter. In an attempt to bring some uniformity to this expansion process, they added a tetrahedral gel matrix to form a crystal lattice structure that should expand the tissue evenly in different directions . Even cooler, they’ve figured out how to make the brain section even bigger than what they just expanded! First, they use proteins to attach the matrix, that keeps everything uniform, to the tissue. Then they let it expand. Next, they attach a new matrix to the expanded tissue and let it expand again [3, Figure 2]. The result is a piece of brain tissue much larger than it originally was. Now they can see what’s really inside using a standard (but still expensive) laboratory grade microscope.
Figure 2. Start with a piece of tissue. Then stain it to follow a certain cell through the expansion process. Link the tissue to a matrix to keep the expansion uniform, then let it expand! Source: Wikimedia Commons, Kanethecat
One major caveat to this technique is the lack of retention of intercellular interactions. By pulling everything in a piece of brain tissue apart from each other, you are able to see much more than before, but not how it is packed in there. That is a big drawback for researchers investigating cellular signalling because they can no longer see the original configuration of all of these tiny pieces within tissue. What touches what is often a huge indication of information flow through the brain. Ultimately, no technique is perfect, but this one will allow us to gain insight into how some cellular interactions are happening in the first place.
Boyden’s group and many other scientists are very excited to use this technology in densely packed cells, such as brain tumors, to better understand what’s really going on inside our heads. Another great aspect of this technology is that it is being shared with researchers in a broad range of disciplines to aid in a variety of studies from evolution to cancer. As it turns out, you don’t need to spend millions of dollars on a microscope that takes up an entire room. Babies had the answer all along.
 Wassie, Asmamaw T., Zhao, Yongxin, & Boyden, Edward S. “Expansion microscopy: principles and uses in biological research.” Nature Methods 16 (2019): 33–41.
 Chen, Fei, Tillberg, Paul W., Boyden, Edward S. “Expansion microscopy.” Science 347 (2015) 6221: 543-548.
 Physical Specimen Expansion, Enabling 3-D Large Volume, Nanoscale Imaging http://expansionmicroscopy.org/
More From Thats Life [Science]
- CRISPR technology may be a promising tool to combat multidrug resistant fungus C. auris
- How the search for a universal gene forever changed biology: the story of Carl Woese and 16S sequencing
- Quarantine Blues? The Effects of Social Isolation in the Brain
- The Lovebug Effect
- CRISPR: Careful When Running with Genetic Scissors
- More ›